Summary
- The 2026 World Cup generated $20 billion in prediction market volume and $24 million in digital collectible trades, with over 400,000 wallets participating in blockchain-based betting throughout the tournament.
- While Chainalysis identified $5.4 million in flows from sanctioned sources (primarily Huobi/HTX), less than 1% of bettor wallets showed illicit ties, highlighting that the vast majority of on-chain activity was driven by legitimate fans.
- FIFA’s official “FIFA Collect” platform demonstrated the practical utility of blockchain by allowing 100,000 fans to secure match tickets through digital assets; the platform’s strict KYC protocols resulted in negligible exposure to illicit funds compared to decentralized prediction markets.
This year’s FIFA World Cup was the largest ever by many well-worn benchmarks: attendance (6.8 million), ad spend ($10.5 billion), and US TV viewership (66 million for the final alone). It was also one of the biggest-ever sporting events as measured by on-chain activity. Chainalysis’s research reveals the football tournament generated $20 billion in prediction market volume from January 2026 onward, and $24 million in collectable trading volume since May 2025.
Close to 400k wallets interacted with blockchain-based prediction markets, generating $5.7B in volumes during the length of the tournament. Key storylines (for example: who will win the World Cup?) saw the most activity, but other niche questions attracted millions of dollars, too. One memorable market asked bettors whether they thought soon-to-retire Portuguese star Cristiano Ronaldo would cry at the end of his campaign. (he did, according to the market; it generated $49 million in volume along the way). Across all markets — novelty or no — 55% of bettors came out ahead. Of that group, 79% were experienced prediction market prognosticators.
Beyond prediction markets, another on-chain enterprise capitalized on FIFA’s global reach: digital collectibles. An official FIFA program called “FIFA Collect” allowed fans to buy and sell digital moments commemorating the tournament’s biggest stars. It also acted as a less-discussed access path to the tournament itself. Collectors could turn their digital trinkets into real-world tickets, or buy access to the games from other collectors on secondary markets. This stablecoin-powered economy generated at least $24 million before and during the World Cup, according to our review. While the sum is hardly a show-stopper when compared to other major moneymakers, its modest success may hint at the shape of things to come.
Understanding digital flows will become increasingly important as more of the world’s financial infrastructure moves on-chain. Our breakdown of the activity orbiting the World Cup traces where the money comes from, where it goes, and what it tells us about the state of on-chain finance. Even amid the tournament’s overwhelmingly legitimate activity, our analysis surfaced wallets with direct ties to illicit actors. The World Cup offers a microcosm of crypto’s expanding role in everyday life, and a preview of why the tools to follow the money will need to keep pace.
Months of bets before the main event
The five-week-long World Cup put a capstone on years of competition by national football teams — but also by bettors taking a chance on their fate. Our analysis of the 2026 campaign actually begins in January 2026, well before the tournament’s official start but in the final months of the qualification campaign.
Prediction market users began 2026 generating nearly $50 million in daily on-chain volumes within FIFA World Cup markets, according to Chainalysis research. Spending their capital predominantly on match outcome markets, which included qualifying matches that ended in March 2026, along with group placement and tournament match outcomes. Participants maintained the $50 million level as a lower daily bound for the entire run-up to the tournament. But during especially active periods, they surpassed $100 million in daily activity.
Volume began to soar as soon as the World Cup matches began. Shortly after the opening on June 11, daily volumes jumped to the $250 million range. They continued to trend higher through nearly the entirety of the tournament, tapering off only toward the end, when the dwindling number of teams left fewer matches to actively bet on and games were more spaced out. The tournament’s final more than made up for the drop-off. Bettors powered over $300 million in volumes on the final when Spain bested Argentina. During the tournaments, FIFA World Cup markets made up approximately 63% of total prediction market volume. During the tournaments, FIFA World Cup markets made up approximately 63% of total prediction market volume, our research shows.
The tournament itself also saw an uptick in prediction markets for less headline-grabbing questions than simply the outcomes of matches. As shown by the orange and light blue areas of the chart, markets focused on statistics and general questions, such as will Cristiano Ronaldo cry, generated modest volumes during the meat of the action.
Where in the world
Chainalysis uses a variety of advanced tooling to understand where flows come from. On-chain prediction markets serve a global audience; by using proprietary geos methodology, we can gain insight into the country-level distribution of prediction market betting volume surrounding the World Cup.
Our analysis of flows shows that the 2026 World Cup truly was a global phenomenon for prediction markets. Countries on every continent (minus Antarctica) contributed meaningfully to the topline volume numbers. But the US and China led the pack, along with Canada, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. Our Choropleth map (see above) visualizes attributable country-by-country volume flows on a log scale. The more vibrant orange a country appears, the higher their totals. Conversely, the more light blue a country is, the less their totals. Countries in gray are those for which we do not have data. (Country attribution is based on Chainalysis geolocation methodology and may carry uncertainty for wallets using VPNs, mixers, or other privacy tools that obscure true location.)
Illicit interactions
The tournament’s prediction market users were predominantly sports fans and other people who thought they had an edge in understanding what would come of their favored matchup. Not all of those fans had “clean” money, however. We looked at the counterparties that World Cup bettors transacted with before placing their wagers. Approximately 3,700 wallets (<1% of total) had illicit interaction histories that we could parse out on-chain.
By volume, the single-largest source was Huobi/HTX. That major international crypto exchange was sanctioned in late May by UK and more recently EU authorities for allegedly facilitating Russian crypto flows. Its broad international user base inevitably overlapped with the tournament’s global audience. At least $5.4 million in volumes directly flowed from Huobi into wallets that bet on World Cup prediction markets.
Many other illicit nexuses appear in the on-chain records:
- Scam-linked wallets: ~$2 million in total volume
- Stolen funds exposure: $800,000+
- OTC desks: ~$500,000
Boom in Collectibles
FIFA took its multibillion-dollar football machine on-chain for the 2026 World Cup. It created a digital collectibles platform, FIFA Collect, where fans could buy and sell NFTs commemorating players, teams, and moments on the pitch. These trinkets also had real-world utility. Participants could turn their NFTs into actual tickets for the 2026 World Cup.
The platform offered an alternative access path to the tournament for fans. Instead of taking a chance on accessing tickets through highly competitive lotteries, they could instead pay a premium for the “right to buy” tickets later. According to FIFA Collect, over 100,000 fans scored tickets to matches through the platform.
Chainalysis analyzed the smart contracts associated with FIFA Collect on the Avalanche blockchain. We identified a key wallet that accepted minting payments, processed secondary market purchases, and paid out sellers, too. From May 2025 through the end of the tournament this wallet received $24 million in payments from NFT collectors. It subtracted FIFA’s take of every transaction (5%) from that owed to the users. Every so often, its owner manually forwarded FIFA’s share to a stopover wallet, and then on to a mainstream exchange — likely for cashout. This chain of transactions indicated FIFA collected at least $6 million from secondary transactions.
Analyzing user activity
Users’ on-chain histories also give us a window into where in the world they were from. The majority of funds flowed from users in countries that had qualified for the World Cup. They contributed $17.6 million in total purchases; meanwhile, wallets from the rest of the world contributed $6.6 million.
FIFA Collect was only moderately successful in onboarding new users into crypto. Most of the value entering the platform came from experienced wallets: those with a preexisting history of transacting on chain. But both new and experienced users were more interested in trading on FIFA Collect than just buying and holding: a minority of the capital provided by both groups flowed into purchasing assets alone.
Negligible direct exposure to illicit flows
FIFA’s NFT platform had remarkably little exposure to illicit crypto flows. Of the $24 million its smart contract took in, only a minuscule amount had ties to bad actors, like scammers, thieves, or sanctioned entities.
The low share of illicit coins may be a result of FIFA’s robust KYC practices. Our analysis of FIFA Collect’s onboarding procedures found that it was undertaking comprehensive checks on its users. In order to buy access to tickets, users had to prove who they were and declare the source of their funds. Each profile went through a manual verification procedure, too. Intense vetting likely served to dissuade bad actors from participating; criminals seldom expose themselves to such probing. That may be one reason why our review of FIFA’s on-chain presence found negligible exposure to illicit sources. In other words, the money we could track flowing into FIFA Collect was largely clean.
Takeaways
The relative success of FIFA Collect and the record-smashing volumes put up by prediction markets point to a future where major global events increasingly play out on-chain. The contrast between the two ecosystems is instructive. FIFA Collect, by comparison, generated far more modest volumes, and even more meager illicit flows. Together, these two case studies illustrate both the promise and the challenge of crypto’s expanding role in mainstream events: open platforms can unlock massive global participation, but without robust compliance controls, they also open the door to abuse. As on-chain economies continue to attach themselves to the world’s biggest stages, the ability to trace, attribute, and assess those flows in real time will only grow more critical — for regulators, platforms, and the fans whose money is on the line.
FAQs
How much cryptocurrency volume was generated by the 2026 World Cup?
The 2026 World Cup saw a massive $20 billion in total prediction market volume from January 2026 through the end of the tournament. Specifically, $5.7 billion was generated during the five weeks of the event itself, while the official “FIFA Collect” NFT platform generated an additional $24 million in stablecoin-powered transaction volume.
How did FIFA use NFTs for World Cup tickets?
Through the “FIFA Collect” platform on the Avalanche blockchain, fans could purchase digital collectibles that served as an alternative access path to the tournament. These NFTs allowed collectors to secure the “right to buy” or directly redeem digital assets for real-world match tickets, helping over 100,000 fans attend games without relying solely on traditional ticket lotteries.
What percentage of World Cup crypto betting is linked to illicit activity?
According to Chainalysis research, less than 1% of the 400,000 wallets that interacted with World Cup prediction markets had ties to illicit actors. While approximately $5.4 million in volume was traced to sanctioned exchanges like Huobi/HTX, the vast majority of the $20 billion in on-chain flows was driven by legitimate sports fans.
Which countries had the most on-chain activity during the World Cup?
On-chain participation in the 2026 World Cup was a global phenomenon, with the United States and China leading in total prediction market volume. Other top contributing countries included Canada, Thailand, and the United Kingdom, reflecting a widespread international interest in blockchain-based betting and digital collectibles.
This website contains links to third-party sites that are not under the control of Chainalysis, Inc. or its affiliates (collectively “Chainalysis”). Access to such information does not imply association with, endorsement of, approval of, or recommendation by Chainalysis of the site or its operators, and Chainalysis is not responsible for the products, services, or other content hosted therein.
This material is for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide legal, tax, financial, or investment advice. Recipients should consult their own advisors before making these types of decisions. Chainalysis has no responsibility or liability for any decision made or any other acts or omissions in connection with Recipient’s use of this material.
Chainalysis does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of the information in this report and will not be responsible for any claim attributable to errors, omissions, or other inaccuracies of any part of such material.
